r/Whatcouldgowrong peaks Thursdays 4am-6am UTC
r/Whatcouldgowrong was created on April 27, 2013, making it 12 years and 12 months old and one of the older subreddits on Reddit. With 7,878,747 members, this is a large and well-established subreddit with significant reach and influence on Reddit.
r/Whatcouldgowrong is steadily growing, with 21,269 new members in the last 30 days.
r/Whatcouldgowrong is a large-scale Reddit community centered on sharing user-submitted content depicting moments where plans, attempts, or actions have visibly and often dramatically failed. With over 7.8 million subscribers, it functions as a significant hub for observing unintended consequences, primarily through short videos and images. The atmosphere is characterized by a blend of schadenfreude and communal amusement, where the sheer scale of engagement—evidenced by average posts garnering over 16,000 upvotes and 600 comments—fosters a dynamic focused on rapid content consumption and reaction. While centered on failure, the community generally maintains a lighthearted, non-malicious tone; comments frequently highlight the humor in the mishaps or speculate on the sequence of events, though overt mockery is typically discouraged by moderation in favor of shared observation. Peak activity on Sunday evenings UTC aligns with periods of high user availability for休闲 browsing.
The subreddit predominantly features viral clips and photos showcasing physical mishaps, botched DIY projects, animal antics gone awry, and stunts or pranks with immediate, negative repercussions. Content ranges from minor, relatable errors (like a cooking disaster) to spectacular, high-impact failures (such as structural collapses or extreme sports wipeouts). Crucially, the community has evolved beyond simple "fail" entertainment; the implied lesson within its description—"The best place to learn what not to do"—resonates with many users who engage by analyzing *why* something failed, identifying safety oversights, or noting侥幸 escapes. This subtle layer of unintentional cautionary education distinguishes it from purely shock-focused communities. The consistent high engagement metrics reflect a predictable formula: content must be visually clear, demonstrate a definitive negative outcome directly linked to a prior action, and possess an inherent "I should have seen that coming" quality.
r/Whatcouldgowrong's uniqueness lies in its massive scale combined with a specific, narrowly defined focus on the *anticipation* and *consequence* of failure within a single, concise piece of content. Unlike broader humor or news subreddits, it curates a highly consistent experience centered on the universal human tendency to misjudge risks or outcomes. This predictability, coupled with the potential for both laughter and a fleeting moment of reflective caution, sustains its broad appeal. The community particularly attracts users seeking easily digestible, visually-driven entertainment with a consistent theme, those interested in observing human (or animal) error patterns, and individuals who appreciate the subtle, often unspoken, safety lessons embedded within the spectacle. It serves as a digital repository of cautionary tales, presented primarily for engagement and amusement, but occasionally prompting genuine consideration of risk assessment.
r/Whatcouldgowrong shows moderate engagement relative to its size, with an average of 6850.6 upvotes per post across its 7,878,747 members. The community is primarily content-consumption focused, with a comment-to-upvote ratio of 0.06. To reach the Hot section of r/Whatcouldgowrong, posts typically need at least 7 upvotes, reflecting the community's activity level.
Posts on r/Whatcouldgowrong receive an average of 398.1 comments, indicating a community that primarily engages through upvoting content. Posts tend to be appreciated more through voting than through discussion in the comments.
Based on an analysis of 21 top posts from the past week, Thursday is the most active day with 6 posts reaching the top, while Tuesday sees the least activity with 1 posts. Activity is fairly evenly distributed between weekdays and weekends.
The peak posting hours are around 4am UTC (3 posts), 4pm UTC (3 posts), and 1am UTC (3 posts). The quietest hours are 2pm UTC, 9am UTC, and 11pm UTC, with only 1-1 posts each reaching the top during these times.
Weekly breakdown: Monday (1), Tuesday (1), Wednesday (4), Thursday (6), Friday (3), Saturday (4), Sunday (2) posts reaching the top.
r/Whatcouldgowrong currently has 7,878,747 subscribers. Over the past 30 days, the community has grown by 21,269 members (0.27%), averaging 686 new subscribers per day. This growth rate places r/Whatcouldgowrong in the top 18% of all tracked subreddits.
Over the past 90 days, r/Whatcouldgowrong has gained 81,572 subscribers (1.05%). Since tracking began 618 days ago, the community has added 321,976 total subscribers. Growth has been accelerating recently compared to the longer-term trend.
r/Whatcouldgowrong is steadily growing, with 21,269 new members in the last 30 days.
r/Whatcouldgowrong has 7,878,747 subscribers as of April 2026.
The best time to post on r/Whatcouldgowrong is Thursdays 4am-6am UTC, based on analysis of top-performing posts from the past week.
r/Whatcouldgowrong is steadily growing, with 21,269 new members in the last 30 days.
r/Whatcouldgowrong was created on April 27, 2013, making it 12 years old.
Posts on r/Whatcouldgowrong typically need at least 7 upvotes to reach the Hot section.
r/Whatcouldgowrong is a Reddit community with 7,878,747 subscribers. The community describes itself as: "The best place to learn what not to do." The best time to post on r/Whatcouldgowrong is Thursdays 4am-6am UTC. Posts receive an average of 6850.6 upvotes and 398.1 comments. The minimum upvotes needed to reach the Hot section is approximately 7. The subreddit is adding approximately 686 new members each day. Founded 12 years ago, r/Whatcouldgowrong is tracked and analyzed by RedditList as part of its comprehensive database of over 106,350 subreddits.
Last updated: 2026-04-18 03:38:19